'Amy Covid Barrett' Trends as Left Goes 'Absolutely Crazy' Over 5-4 SCOTUS Ruling on Religious Events
” Nearly” as satisfying as the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to block New york city Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s order limiting the size of religious events– seemingly to combat against the spread of COVID– has been seeing the predictable apoplectic meltdown on the Left.
Furthermore, the enjoyment is made extra unique by knowing that they know SCOTUS might well not have actually even used up the case– just as it declined to do in 2 comparable cases previously this year– if Amy Coney Barrett were not on the Court to cast the tie-breaker.
And best of all is understanding that the Democrat Party and its dancing monkeys in the liberal media understand damn well Wednesday’s SCOTUS choice was a precursor of things to come.
That knowledge is twofold.
Initially, Barrett’s confirmation solidified a conservative majority on the Court, made even more vital on Wednesday when Chief Justice John Roberts once again showed his true colors by sidling up along with the 3 liberal justices and casting with his lot with them.
Second, the knowledge that despite the outcome of the 2020 governmental election, Donald Trump’s tradition is not just secured; it was manifested on Wednesday night.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York accused the U.S. Supreme Court of political partisanship after it declined his coronavirus constraints on spiritual services. He suggested the 5-to-4 choice was a reflection of the court’s new conservative majority. https://t.co/CwuJfvuEsu
— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 26, 2020
Let the hyperbolic histrionics start!
Within minutes of news of the SCOTUS judgment breaking, Leftists cranked up their typical level of hysteria to full-blast crazy-train, as “Amy Covid Barrett” started to trend on social networks. As reported by our buddies at Twitchy, smug blue-checkmark Twitter users led the clown automobile parade out of eviction.
Vocalist Deren Ney was just one numerous to play the “Amy Covid Barrett” card, no doubt believing it was clever– and devastating.
Impeach Amy Covid Barrett
— Deren Ney (@DerenNey) November 26, 2020
Screenwriter Randi Mayem Vocalist promised to call ACB “Amy Covid Barrett” for the rest of her( miserable) life; as if the Hollywood lefty wouldn’t create an even “better” label for Barrett, sooner or later.
I guarantee I will call her Amy Covid Barrett for the rest of her unqualified zealot hack judge life.
— Randi Mayem Vocalist (@rmayemsinger) November 26, 2020
Author Ali A. Rizvi went with a ridiculous “death” tweet. (Pay no attention to Laurence Tribe’s drivel; he was lying and he understood it.)
Amy Covid Barrett literally eliminating it at SCOTUS https://t.co/6EDgf3frOZ pic.twitter.com/kNmUZtxGNJ
— Ali A. Rizvi (@aliamjadrizvi) November 26, 2020
This lunatic “developer of animation” didn’t understand whether to laugh about the silly label or weep about the “thousands and thousands” of more sure deaths that ACB “simply handed us.”
I wish to laugh that Amy Covid Barrett is trending however can’t stop thinking of the thousands and thousands more deaths she just handed us.
— Q. Allan Brocka (@allanbrocka) November 26, 2020
ARTIST AND AUTHOR TONY POSNANSKI WAS OBVIOUSLY SO UPSET THAT HE DECIDED TO GO ALL-CAPS JUST TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY KNEW IT.
HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO EVERYBODY OTHER THAN THE GOP, SUPER SPREADERS, AND JUDGE AMY COVID BARRETT.
— Tony Posnanski (@tonyposnanski) November 26, 2020
Somewhere Else, One Of The Most Trusted Name in News ™ trotted out a medical professional to slam the judgment as an “definitely crazy” choice that “devalues human lives.” Dr. Peter Hotez stated, after being cued up by CNN fill-in host Boris Sanchez:
” Yeah, it’s absolutely crazy.
” And that Supreme Court ruling did simply that– it decreases the value of human lives and makes it truly hard for our healthcare service providers to supply the very best care possible to lower death rates.”
Sanchez “forgot” to ask Hotez if he although believed months of “tranquil protests” cheapened human lives. Or perhaps Sanchez simply believed those lives were “inexpensive.” [sarc]
While we’re at it, I question if the great medical professional thinks abortion– or as Biden calls it, “ an important health care service“– “decreases the value of human life.”
Former Obama stooge Ben Rhodes– Rhodes is still a stooge; he just does not work for Chicago Jesus Barrack Obama, anymore– busted out the I-word– “invalid”– the Left’s favorite word over the last 4 years.
The brand-new illegitimate 5-4 SCOTUS bulk reversing a policy to put more lives in threat. https://t.co/i8zzrqB6Vr
— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) November 26, 2020
Makes best “sense,” right? Invalid president begets invalid Supreme Court Justice begets illegitimate Supreme Court decision.
Even the “victim” of the SCOTUS ruling himself lashed out at the Court’s decision; then again, noted “Leadership” expert Andrew Cuomo always blasts those who right his wrongs.
” We understand who he selected to the Court and we know their ideology,” Cuomo stated calling the choice “irrelevant” and “moot.”
” The Supreme Court made a judgment. It’s more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else.
” It’s unimportant of any practical effect due to the fact that of the zone they were speaking about is moot. It ended recently,” the governor said, adding, “It doesn’t have any practical impact.
” The claim had to do with the Brooklyn zone. The Brooklyn zone no longer exists as a red zone. That’s mooted. So that limitation is no longer in result. That situation just does not exist due to the fact that those constraints are gone.”
” Practical effect” aside, Cuomo was lying. Lying in the sense that he understands complete well that the SCOTUS ruling develops precedent, which the next time he gets a wild hair up his thinks about going all Andrew Cuomo with a comparable order he may first hesitate.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo responds to Supreme Court obstructing constraints on holy places: “We understand who he designated to the court, we understand their ideology.” pic.twitter.com/XJhp96 LBfK
— The Hill (@thehill) November 27, 2020
The bottom line:
Initially, triumph for the First Change and religious liberty in the U.S. Supreme Court. Then, the satisfying understanding that the Left not only lost its collective crap over this choice; but that it likewise understands full well that the choice was a precursor of things to come– made possible by a solidified conservative bulk on Court.
And best of all, Donald Trump “did that.” (That was for you, Chicago Jesus Barack Obama.)
And the Democrats can’t do a damn thing about it.
Comments
Post a Comment